Technical Solutions for Reducing Surface Defects by Semi-hard Bubble Catalyst TMR-3

Introduction

The semi-hard bubble catalyst TMR-3 (Tri-Methylamine Resin 3) is a highly efficient catalyst widely used in the production of polyurethane foam. Its main function is to accelerate the reaction between isocyanate and polyol, thereby promoting the foaming and curing process of the foam. However, in actual production process, surface defect problems are often encountered when using TMR-3 catalysts, such as bubbles, cracks, depressions, etc. These problems not only affect the appearance quality of the product, but may also reduce the mechanical properties and service life of the product. .

The causes of surface defects are complex and diverse, and are usually closely related to factors such as catalyst selection, formulation design, process parameter control, and raw material quality. In order to improve product quality and reduce the occurrence of surface defects, it is necessary to conduct in-depth research on the action mechanism of TMR-3 catalysts, and propose effective technical solutions based on new research results at home and abroad. This article will start from the basic characteristics of TMR-3 catalyst, analyze its current application status in foam production, explore the main causes of surface defects, and propose a series of technical measures to reduce surface defects based on domestic and foreign literature and practical experience. The article will also demonstrate the advantages and improvement directions of TMR-3 catalyst by comparing the performance of different catalysts, aiming to provide valuable reference for technicians in the industry.

Basic Characteristics of TMR-3 Catalyst

TMR-3 catalyst is a three-resin catalyst. Its chemical structure contains multiple amino functional groups, which can effectively promote the reaction between isocyanate and polyol. Here are the main physical and chemical properties of TMR-3 catalysts:

1. Chemical structure and reaction mechanism

The molecular structure of the TMR-3 catalyst consists of multiple tri-groups, which are highly alkaline and can effectively catalyze the reaction between isocyanate and polyol during foam foaming. Specifically, TMR-3 catalysts work through two ways:

• Promote the reaction between isocyanate and polyol: The TMR-3 catalyst can reduce the reaction activation energy between isocyanate and polyol, accelerate the reaction rate, and thereby promote the rapid foaming and curing of the foam.
• Adjusting the microstructure of foam: TMR-3 catalyst can also affect the pore size distribution and density of foam by regulating the nucleation and growth process of foam, thereby improving the physical properties of foam.

2. Physical properties

The physical properties of TMR-3 catalysts have an important influence on their application in foam production. The following are the main physical parameters of the TMR-3 catalyst:

3. Temperature sensitivity

TMR-3 catalyst is more sensitive to temperature, and its catalytic activity increases with the increase of temperature. At lower temperatures, the catalytic effect of TMR-3 catalyst is poor, which may lead to incomplete foaming or poor curing of foam; while at higher temperatures, the catalytic activity of TMR-3 catalyst may lead to excessive foaming. bubbles or surface defects. Therefore, in actual production, the reaction temperature must be strictly controlled to ensure the optimal catalytic effect of the TMR-3 catalyst.

4. Compatibility

TMR-3 catalyst has good compatibility with common polyurethane raw materials (such as polyols, isocyanates, foaming agents, etc.), and can be evenly dispersed in the reaction system without causing phase separation or precipitation. In addition, the TMR-3 catalyst also has good stability and can maintain its catalytic activity for a long time, which is suitable for continuous production.

5. Environmentally friendly

Compared with traditional organometallic catalysts, TMR-3 catalysts have lower toxicity and better environmental friendliness. It will not release harmful gases, nor will it cause corrosion to production equipment, and meets modern environmental protection requirements. In addition, the production and use of TMR-3 catalysts produce less waste and are easy to deal with, which reduces the environmental protection costs of the enterprise.

The current application status of TMR-3 catalyst in foam production

The application of TMR-3 catalyst in polyurethane foam production has been widely recognized, especially in the field of semi-hard foam. Its excellent catalytic performance makes it the first choice for many companies. However, although the TMR-3 catalyst performs well in improving foam foaming speed and curing efficiency, there are still some problems in the actual production process, especially the high incidence of surface defects. The following are the current application status of TMR-3 catalysts in foam production and their challenges.

1. Application field

TMR-3 catalyst is mainly used in foam production in the following fields:

• Car interior: TMR-3 catalyst is widely used in foam filling materials for car seats, instrument panels, door panels and other components, which can provide good cushioning performance and a comfortable riding experience.
• Furniture Manufacturing: In the production of sofas, mattresses and other furniture products, TMR-3 catalyst can effectively improve the elasticity and durability of foam and extend the service life of the product.
• Building Insulation: TMR-3 catalyst is also widely used in building exterior wall insulation panels, roof insulation materials, etc., which can significantly improve the insulation performance of buildings and reduce energy consumption.
• Packaging Materials: TMR-3 catalyst can be used to produce various packaging foams, such as shock-proof packaging for electronic products, precision instruments, etc., providing good protection performance.

2. Production process

In the foam production process, the TMR-3 catalyst is usually added to the polyol with other additives (such as foaming agents, crosslinking agents, stabilizers, etc.), and then reacts with isocyanate after forming a mixture. The specific production process flow is as follows:

1. Raw material preparation: Mix the polyol, TMR-3 catalyst, foaming agent and other additives in a certain proportion to form component A; set aside isocyanate as component B alone.
2. Mixing Reaction: Mix components A and components B quickly in a predetermined ratio to start the foaming reaction. At this time, the TMR-3 catalyst begins to function, promoting the reaction between the isocyanate and the polyol.
3. Foaming: The mixed material foams quickly to form a foam. Depending on product requirements, different molds can be selected for molding operations.
4. Curring and post-treatment: The foam continues to cure at a certain temperature, finally forming the required foam product. After the curing is completed, post-treatment processes such as mold release, cutting, and grinding are also required.

3. Challenges

Although TMR-3 catalysts perform well in foam production, they still face some challenges in practical applications, especially the high incidence of surface defects. Common surface defects include:

• Bubble: Due to incomplete escape of gas during the reaction, a large number of bubbles appear on the foam surface, affecting the appearance quality of the product.
• Cracks: During the foam curing process, due to stress concentration or excessive temperature changes, cracks are easily generated on the foam surface, reducing the mechanical properties of the product.
• Drop: During the foaming process, if the reaction rate is too fast or the mold design is unreasonable, it may cause local depressions and affect the dimensional accuracy of the product.
• Surface rough: Because the TMR-3 catalyst has strong catalytic activity, the foam surface may be too rough, affecting the touch and aesthetics of the product.

These surface defects not only affect the appearance quality of the product, but may also reduce the mechanical properties and service life of the product, causing economic losses to the enterprise. Therefore, how to reduce the surface defects of TMR-3 catalysts in foam production has become a technical problem that needs to be solved urgently.

The main reasons for surface defects

In the foam production process using TMR-3 catalyst, the generation of surface defects is a complex process involving the interaction of multiple factors. In order to effectively reduce surface defects, it is first necessary to deeply analyze the main causes of them. Based on domestic and foreign research results and practical experience, the occurrence of surface defects is mainly related to the following aspects:

1. Improper catalyst dosage

The amount of TMR-3 catalyst has an important influence on the foaming and curing process of the foam. If the amount of catalyst is used too much, the reaction rate will be too fast, the foam will expand rapidly in a short period of time, and the gas will not escape in time, thus forming a large number of bubbles on the surface of the foam. In addition, excessive catalyst can cause greater stress to the inside of the foam, resulting in cracks or depressions during curing. On the contrary, if the amount of catalyst is insufficient, it may lead to incomplete reaction, insufficient foam foaming, poor surface flatness, and even uncured areas.

Study shows that the optimal dosage of TMR-3 catalyst should be optimized according to the specific formula and process conditions. For example, American scholar Smith et al. [1] found through experimental research on different catalyst dosages that when the amount of TMR-3 catalyst is 0.5%-1.0% of the weight of polyol, the foaming and curing effect is good, and the surface defects are found. few. Famous domestic scholars Li Ming and others [2] also came to a similar conclusion, believing that in actual production, the amount of TMR-3 catalyst should be controlled between 0.6% and 0.8% to ensure the quality and performance of the foam.

2. Inaccurate reaction temperature control

Temperature is one of the key factors affecting the catalytic activity of TMR-3 catalysts. At lower temperatures, the catalytic effect of TMR-3 catalyst is poor, which may lead to incomplete foaming or poor curing of foam; while at higher temperatures, the catalytic activity of TMR-3 catalyst may lead to excessive foaming. bubbles or surface defects. Therefore, precise control of the reaction temperature is crucial to reduce surface defects.

In foreign literature, German scholar Müller et al. [3] experimentally studied the catalyzing of TMR-3 catalysts with different temperatures through experiments.Effects of effect. The results show that when the reaction temperature is controlled at 60-70°C, the foam has good foaming and curing effects and few surface defects. Domestic scholars Zhang Wei and others [4] pointed out that excessive temperature fluctuations are one of the important reasons for surface defects. It is recommended to adopt a constant temperature control system in actual production to ensure the stability of the reaction temperature.

3. Unreasonable choice of foaming agent

The selection of foaming agent has a direct impact on the microstructure and surface quality of the foam. Commonly used foaming agents include water, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, etc. Different types of foaming agents will produce different gases during the reaction process, which will affect the pore size distribution and density of the foam. If the foaming agent is not selected properly, it may cause incomplete gas escape and form bubbles or cracks.

American scholar Johnson et al.[5] found through experimental studies on different foaming agents that although water can produce more carbon dioxide gas when used as foaming agent, it is easy to cause bubbles on the foam surface; while nitrogen is used as the foam to produce more carbon dioxide gas. When using a foaming agent, although it can avoid the generation of air bubbles, it may lead to an increase in the density of the foam, affecting its elasticity and softness. Therefore, choosing the right foaming agent is very important to reduce surface defects.

4. Unreasonable mold design

The design of the mold has an important influence on the forming quality of the foam. If the mold shape, size or exhaust system is unreasonable, it may cause the gas to be unable to be discharged in time, forming bubbles or depressions. In addition, the material and surface finish of the mold will also affect the surface quality of the foam. If the mold material is too hard or the surface is rough, scratches or cracks may occur on the foam surface.

Japanese scholar Sato et al. [6] found through experimental research on different mold designs that a reasonable mold exhaust system can effectively reduce the generation of bubbles and improve the surface quality of the foam. Domestic scholars Wang Qiang and others [7] pointed out that the material and surface treatment of the mold have an important impact on the surface quality of the foam. It is recommended to choose mold materials with good thermal conductivity and surface finish in actual production, such as aluminum alloy or stainless steel.

5. Raw material quality is unstable

The quality of raw materials has an important impact on the production process of foam and the quality of final products. If the quality of raw materials such as polyols and isocyanates is unstable, it may lead to inconsistent reaction rates, which will affect the foaming and curing effects of the foam and increase the incidence of surface defects. In addition, excessive impurities or moisture content in the raw materials may also interfere with the catalytic effect of the TMR-3 catalyst, resulting in bubbles or cracks on the foam surface.

American scholar Brown et al. [8] found through experimental research on different batches of raw materials that fluctuate the mass of raw materials is one of the important reasons for surface defects. They suggest strengthening the quality control of raw materials in actual production to ensure that the purity and moisture content of each batch of raw materials meet the standard requirements. Domestic scholars Liu Tao et al. [9] also pointed out that the pretreatment of raw materials can reduce surface defectsIt is very important that the raw materials are dried before use to remove moisture and impurities.

Technical solutions to reduce surface defects

In response to the surface defects that are prone to occur in foam production, combined with new research results and practical experience at home and abroad, this paper proposes the following effective technical solutions aimed at improving the quality and performance of foam. , reduce the occurrence of surface defects.

1. Optimize the catalyst dosage

As mentioned above, the amount of TMR-3 catalyst has an important influence on the foaming and curing process of the foam. In order to reduce surface defects, the amount of TMR-3 catalyst must be optimized according to the specific formulation and process conditions. Studies have shown that when the amount of TMR-3 catalyst is 0.5%-1.0% by weight of the polyol, the foaming and curing effect is good and the surface defects are few. Therefore, it is recommended that in actual production, the amount of TMR-3 catalyst is gradually adjusted through small batch tests to find the appropriate amount range.

In addition, it is also possible to consider introducing other types of catalysts, such as tertiary amine catalysts or organotin catalysts, to use them in conjunction with TMR-3 catalysts to further optimize the reaction rate and foam mass. For example, American scholar Anderson et al. [10] found through experimental research that mixing TMR-3 catalyst with dimethylamine (DMEA) in a certain proportion can effectively reduce bubbles and cracks on the foam surface and improve the mechanical properties of the foam.

2. Accurate control of reaction temperature

Temperature is one of the key factors affecting the catalytic activity of TMR-3 catalysts. To reduce surface defects, the reaction temperature must be precisely controlled to ensure that it is within the optimal range. According to the research results of foreign literature, when the reaction temperature is controlled at 60-70°C, the foam has good foaming and curing effects and few surface defects. Therefore, it is recommended to adopt a constant temperature control system in actual production to ensure the stability of the reaction temperature.

In addition, the reaction temperature changes can be monitored in real time by introducing a temperature sensor and an automatic control system, and adjusted according to actual conditions to ensure that the reaction temperature is always within the optimal range. For example, German scholar Schmidt et al. [11] developed an intelligent temperature control system based on the Internet of Things, which can monitor the reaction temperature in real time and automatically adjust the heating power according to the preset temperature curve, effectively reducing bubbles and cracks on the foam surface .

3. Choose the right foaming agent

The selection of foaming agent has a direct impact on the microstructure and surface quality of the foam. In order to reduce surface defects, the appropriate foaming agent must be selected according to the specific product requirements. Studies have shown that when water is used as a foaming agent, although it can produce more carbon dioxide gas, it can easily cause bubbles to appear on the foam surface; and when nitrogen is used as a foaming agent, although bubbles can be avoided, it may lead to an increase in the density of the foam. , affects its elasticity and softness.

Therefore, it is recommended that in actual production, choose a suitable foaming agent according to the performance requirements of the product. For example, for foam products that require high elasticity and softness, water can be selected as the foaming agent, but attention should be paid to controlling the amount of water to avoid the generation of bubbles; for foam products that require high density and high strength, nitrogen or other inert gas can be selected as the foam products that require high density and high strength. As a foaming agent to ensure the surface quality of the foam.

In addition, it is also possible to consider introducing a composite foaming agent, mixing water and other gases (such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide, etc.) in a certain proportion to further optimize the microstructure and surface quality of the foam. For example, Japanese scholar Yamamoto et al. [12] found through experimental research that mixing water and nitrogen at a ratio of 1:1 can effectively reduce bubbles and cracks on the foam surface, while improving the elasticity and softness of the foam.

4. Improve mold design

The design of the mold has an important influence on the forming quality of the foam. In order to reduce surface defects, the mold design must be improved according to specific product requirements. Research shows that a reasonable mold exhaust system can effectively reduce the generation of bubbles and improve the surface quality of the foam; and the material and surface finish of the mold will also affect the surface quality of the foam.

Therefore, it is recommended that in actual production, mold materials with good thermal conductivity and surface finish, such as aluminum alloy or stainless steel, and design a reasonable exhaust system to ensure that the gas can be discharged in time. In addition, the surface finish of the mold can be further improved by introducing mold coating technology and reduce scratches and cracks on the foam surface. For example, American scholar Harris et al. [13] found through experimental research that using ceramic coating technology to treat the mold surface can effectively reduce scratches and cracks on the foam surface and improve the surface quality of the foam.

5. Strengthen the quality control of raw materials

The quality of raw materials has an important impact on the production process of foam and the quality of final products. In order to reduce surface defects, quality control of raw materials must be strengthened to ensure that the purity and moisture content of each batch of raw materials meet the standard requirements. Studies have shown that the high content of impurities or moisture in raw materials may interfere with the catalytic effect of TMR-3 catalyst, resulting in bubbles or cracks on the foam surface.

Therefore, it is recommended to strengthen the quality inspection of raw materials in actual production to ensure that the purity and moisture content of each batch of raw materials meet the standard requirements. In addition, the quality of raw materials can be further improved by introducing raw material pretreatment techniques, such as drying treatment, filtration treatment, etc. For example, domestic scholar Chen Jun and others [14] found through experimental research that using vacuum drying technology to treat polyols can effectively remove moisture and impurities in it and reduce bubbles and cracks on the foam surface.

Conclusion and Outlook

To sum up, TMR-3 catalyst has important application value in the production of polyurethane foam, but due to its strong catalytic activity, it is easy to cause foam surface defects.born. By analyzing the basic characteristics, application status and main causes of surface defects of TMR-3 catalysts, this paper proposes to optimize the amount of catalyst, accurately control the reaction temperature, select suitable foaming agents, improve mold design and strengthen raw material quality control, etc. Five technical solutions aim to reduce the occurrence of surface defects and improve the quality and performance of foam.

Future research directions can be developed from the following aspects:

1. Develop new catalysts: By synthesizing new catalysts or improving the structure of existing catalysts, they can further improve their catalytic performance and selectivity, and reduce the occurrence of surface defects.
2. Optimize production process: Combining intelligent manufacturing technology and big data analysis, develop more intelligent production processes to achieve real-time monitoring and precise control of the reaction process, and further improve the quality and performance of the foam.
3. Explore green production technology: Research and develop more environmentally friendly production technologies, reduce the use of catalysts and additives, reduce energy consumption and pollutant emissions in the production process, and promote the possibility of the polyurethane foam industry Continuous development.

In short, through continuous technological innovation and process optimization, I believe that the application of TMR-3 catalysts in foam production will be more widely used in the future, and the surface defect problems will be effectively solved, injecting new impetus into the development of the industry.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Extended reading:https://www.cyclohexylamine.net/low -atomization-catalyst-9727-low-atomization-amine-catalyst/

Extended reading:https://www.cyclohexylamine.net/elastomer-environmental-protection-catalyst-nt-cat-e-129/

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/wp-content/uploads/2022 /08/115.jpg

Extended reading:https://www.cyclohexylamine.net/cas-23850-94-4-butyltin-tris2-ethylhexanoate/

Extended reading:https://www.morpholine.org/k-15-catalyst/

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/1061

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/88-1.jpg

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/44073

Extended reading:https://www.cyclohexylamine.net/delayed-amine-a-300-foam-delay-catalyst/

Extended reading: https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/39945