Polyurethane Auxiliary Agents for Waterborne PU Systems

Introduction

Waterborne polyurethane (WBPU) systems have gained significant prominence in coatings, adhesives, and elastomers due to their low volatile organic compound (VOC) content, environmental friendliness, and desirable mechanical properties. However, WBPU systems often require auxiliary agents to overcome limitations related to film formation, stability, application performance, and overall durability. These auxiliary agents play a crucial role in tailoring the properties of WBPU systems to meet specific application requirements. This article provides a comprehensive overview of polyurethane auxiliary agents used in WBPU systems, covering their classifications, mechanisms of action, typical properties, application considerations, and future trends.

1. Classification of Polyurethane Auxiliary Agents

WBPU auxiliary agents can be broadly classified based on their function and chemical nature. The following categories represent the most commonly used types:

• Film Formation Aids (Coalescents): These agents facilitate the formation of a continuous and uniform film by reducing the minimum film formation temperature (MFFT) of the WBPU dispersion.
• Thickeners (Rheology Modifiers): Thickeners control the viscosity and flow behavior of the WBPU formulation, improving application properties such as sag resistance and leveling.
• Wetting Agents and Dispersants: These additives enhance the wetting of the substrate and improve the dispersion stability of pigments and fillers in the WBPU system.
• Defoamers and Air Release Agents: Defoamers eliminate or reduce the formation of foam during processing and application, while air release agents facilitate the removal of entrapped air bubbles.
• Leveling Agents: Leveling agents promote the formation of a smooth and uniform coating surface by reducing surface tension gradients.
• Crosslinkers: Crosslinkers enhance the mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and durability of the WBPU film by forming covalent bonds between polymer chains.
• Plasticizers: Plasticizers increase the flexibility and elongation of the WBPU film by reducing the glass transition temperature (Tg).
• UV Stabilizers and Antioxidants: These additives protect the WBPU film from degradation caused by ultraviolet (UV) radiation and oxidation.
• Biocides and Preservatives: These agents prevent the growth of microorganisms in the WBPU formulation, extending its shelf life and preventing spoilage.
• pH Adjusters: pH adjusters maintain the desired pH range of the WBPU system, ensuring stability and optimal performance.

2. Film Formation Aids (Coalescents)

• Mechanism of Action: WBPU dispersions consist of polymer particles dispersed in water. As water evaporates, the polymer particles come into close proximity. Coalescents reduce the MFFT by plasticizing the polymer particles, allowing them to fuse together and form a continuous film at lower temperatures. They temporarily soften the polymer chains, facilitating interdiffusion and entanglement.

• Types of Coalescents:

  • Glycol Ethers: (e.g., Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (EGBE), Diethylene glycol monobutyl ether (DGBE))
  • Ester Alcohols: (e.g., Texanol (2,2,4-Trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate))
  • Plasticizer Esters: (e.g., Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP), Dioctyl Phthalate (DOP) – Although less commonly used due to environmental concerns)

• Advantages: Lower MFFT, improved film formation, enhanced gloss.

• Disadvantages: Potential VOC emissions, plasticization effect can affect mechanical properties.

• Product Parameters:

• Table 1: Comparison of Common Coalescents

3. Thickeners (Rheology Modifiers)

• Mechanism of Action: Thickeners increase the viscosity of the WBPU formulation by forming a three-dimensional network structure in the aqueous phase. This network can be formed through hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions, or hydrophobic associations.

• Types of Thickeners:

  • Cellulosic Thickeners: (e.g., Hydroxyethyl Cellulose (HEC), Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose (HPMC)) – Provide water retention and thickening.
  • Acrylic Thickeners: (e.g., Alkali Swellable Emulsions (ASE), Hydrophobically modified Alkali Swellable Emulsions (HASE)) – Effective thickeners with good shear thinning properties.
  • Polyurethane Thickeners: (e.g., Hydrophobically modified Ethoxylated Urethane (HEUR)) – Offer excellent flow and leveling, as well as good water resistance.
  • Inorganic Thickeners: (e.g., Bentonite clay, Fumed Silica) – Provide thickening and can also improve suspension stability.

• Advantages: Improved application properties, sag resistance, leveling, pigment suspension.

• Disadvantages: Can affect water resistance, gloss, and transparency.

• Product Parameters:

• Table 2: Comparison of Common Thickeners

4. Wetting Agents and Dispersants

• Mechanism of Action: Wetting agents reduce the surface tension of the WBPU formulation, allowing it to wet the substrate more effectively. Dispersants stabilize pigment particles in the WBPU system, preventing agglomeration and settling.

• Types of Wetting Agents and Dispersants:

  • Non-ionic Surfactants: (e.g., Alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEs) – though being phased out due to environmental concerns, Alcohol ethoxylates) – Provide good wetting and emulsification.
  • Anionic Surfactants: (e.g., Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), Docusate Sodium) – Effective at dispersing pigments.
  • Cationic Surfactants: (e.g., Quaternary ammonium compounds) – Less commonly used in WBPU systems.
  • Polymeric Dispersants: (e.g., Acrylic copolymers, Polyurethane copolymers) – Provide excellent steric stabilization of pigments.

• Advantages: Improved substrate wetting, enhanced pigment dispersion, increased color strength.

• Disadvantages: Can cause foaming, affect water resistance.

• Product Parameters:

• Table 3: Comparison of Common Wetting Agents and Dispersants

5. Defoamers and Air Release Agents

• Mechanism of Action: Defoamers destabilize foam bubbles by reducing surface tension and promoting bubble coalescence. Air release agents facilitate the escape of entrapped air bubbles from the WBPU formulation.

• Types of Defoamers and Air Release Agents:

  • Silicone-based Defoamers: (e.g., Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)) – Highly effective, but can cause surface defects.
  • Mineral Oil-based Defoamers: – Cost-effective, but less effective than silicone-based defoamers.
  • Polyether-based Defoamers: – Good compatibility with WBPU systems, reduced risk of surface defects.
  • Silica-based Defoamers: – Combine defoaming with matting effects.

• Advantages: Reduced foaming, improved surface appearance, enhanced application properties.

• Disadvantages: Can cause surface defects (e.g., cratering, fish eyes), affect recoatability.

• Product Parameters:

• Table 4: Comparison of Common Defoamers

6. Leveling Agents

• Mechanism of Action: Leveling agents reduce surface tension gradients, allowing the WBPU formulation to flow and form a smooth, uniform coating surface.

• Types of Leveling Agents:

  • Silicone-based Leveling Agents: (e.g., Polysiloxanes) – Provide excellent leveling, but can cause surface defects.
  • Acrylic Leveling Agents: – Offer good leveling with reduced risk of surface defects.
  • Fluorosurfactants: – Highly effective at reducing surface tension, but can be expensive and environmentally persistent.

• Advantages: Improved surface appearance, reduced orange peel, enhanced gloss.

• Disadvantages: Can cause surface defects, affect recoatability.

7. Crosslinkers

• Mechanism of Action: Crosslinkers react with the WBPU polymer chains, forming covalent bonds that enhance the mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and durability of the film.

• Types of Crosslinkers:

  • Polyaziridines: React with carboxylic acid groups in the PU.
  • Polycarbodiimides: React with carboxylic acid groups in the PU.
  • Melamine Formaldehyde Resins: – React with hydroxyl groups in the PU (Formaldehyde concerns limit use).
  • Isocyanates (Blocked): – React with hydroxyl or amine groups in the PU upon deblocking at elevated temperatures.
  • Epoxy Resins: – React with amine or carboxylic acid groups in the PU.

• Advantages: Improved hardness, chemical resistance, abrasion resistance, and solvent resistance.

• Disadvantages: Can affect flexibility, pot life, and require specific curing conditions.

8. Plasticizers

• Mechanism of Action: Plasticizers reduce the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the WBPU polymer, increasing its flexibility and elongation.

• Types of Plasticizers:

  • Phthalate Esters: (e.g., Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP), Dioctyl Phthalate (DOP)) – (Less commonly used due to environmental concerns).
  • Adipate Esters: (e.g., Dioctyl Adipate (DOA)) – Provide good low-temperature flexibility.
  • Citrate Esters: (e.g., Tributyl Citrate (TBC)) – Biodegradable and non-toxic.
  • Benzoate Esters: – Good solvency and plasticizing efficiency.

• Advantages: Increased flexibility, improved elongation, reduced cracking.

• Disadvantages: Can affect hardness, tensile strength, and migration potential.

9. UV Stabilizers and Antioxidants

• Mechanism of Action: UV stabilizers absorb or screen UV radiation, preventing it from damaging the WBPU polymer. Antioxidants scavenge free radicals, inhibiting oxidative degradation.

• Types of UV Stabilizers and Antioxidants:

  • Hindered Amine Light Stabilizers (HALS): – Scavenge free radicals and protect against UV degradation.
  • UV Absorbers (UVAs): (e.g., Benzotriazoles, Benzophenones) – Absorb UV radiation and dissipate it as heat.
  • Antioxidants: (e.g., Hindered phenols, Phosphites) – Prevent oxidative degradation.

• Advantages: Improved weatherability, extended service life, reduced discoloration.

• Disadvantages: Can be expensive, affect color and transparency.

10. Biocides and Preservatives

• Mechanism of Action: Biocides prevent the growth of microorganisms in the WBPU formulation, extending its shelf life and preventing spoilage. Preservatives protect the WBPU film from microbial attack.

• Types of Biocides and Preservatives:

  • Isothiazolinones: (e.g., CMIT/MIT) – Broad-spectrum activity.
  • Benzisothiazolinone (BIT): – Effective against bacteria and fungi.
  • Formaldehyde Releasers: (e.g., DMDM Hydantoin) – (Less commonly used due to formaldehyde concerns).

• Advantages: Extended shelf life, prevents spoilage, protects against microbial attack.

• Disadvantages: Can be toxic, affect color and odor.

11. pH Adjusters

• Mechanism of Action: pH adjusters maintain the desired pH range of the WBPU system, ensuring stability and optimal performance.

• Types of pH Adjusters:

  • Amines: (e.g., Triethylamine (TEA), Dimethylethanolamine (DMEA)) – Increase pH.
  • Acids: (e.g., Acetic acid, Citric acid) – Decrease pH.

• Advantages: Improved stability, optimal performance.

• Disadvantages: Can affect odor and corrosion.

12. Application Considerations

The selection and use of WBPU auxiliary agents require careful consideration of several factors, including:

• Compatibility: Ensure that the auxiliary agent is compatible with the WBPU dispersion and other additives in the formulation.
• Dosage: Optimize the dosage of the auxiliary agent to achieve the desired effect without compromising other properties.
• Application Method: Consider the application method (e.g., spray, brush, roller) and adjust the formulation accordingly.
• Environmental Regulations: Comply with relevant environmental regulations regarding VOC emissions and hazardous substances.
• Cost: Balance the performance benefits of the auxiliary agent with its cost.

13. Future Trends

The development of WBPU auxiliary agents is driven by the increasing demand for environmentally friendly and high-performance coatings, adhesives, and elastomers. Future trends include:

• Bio-based Auxiliary Agents: Development of auxiliary agents derived from renewable resources, such as plant oils and sugars.
• Multifunctional Additives: Development of auxiliary agents that provide multiple benefits, such as film formation, thickening, and UV stabilization.
• Nanomaterials: Incorporation of nanomaterials, such as nano-clay and nano-silica, to enhance the mechanical properties, barrier properties, and durability of WBPU films.
• Smart Additives: Development of additives that respond to external stimuli, such as temperature, pH, or light, to provide specific functionalities.
• Lower VOC or VOC-Free formulations: Further reduction or elimination of VOCs in auxiliary agents to meet stringent environmental regulations.

Conclusion

Polyurethane auxiliary agents are essential components of WBPU systems, enabling the tailoring of their properties to meet specific application requirements. A wide range of auxiliary agents are available, each with its own unique properties and benefits. Careful selection and use of these agents are crucial for achieving optimal performance and durability of WBPU coatings, adhesives, and elastomers. The future of WBPU auxiliary agents is focused on developing environmentally friendly, multifunctional, and high-performance additives to meet the growing demands of the industry.

Literature Sources:

1. Wicks, D. A., Jones, F. N., & Pappas, S. P. (2007). Organic coatings: science and technology. John Wiley & Sons.
2. Lambourne, R., & Strivens, T. A. (1999). Paint and surface coatings: theory and practice. Woodhead Publishing.
3. Calvert, K. O. (2002). Polyurethane for coatings. Vincentz Network.
4. Ashworth, J. (2010). Additives for waterborne coatings. Smithers Rapra Publishing.
5. Gao, W., & Li, X. (2017). Waterborne polyurethane: Mechanisms, synthesis and applications. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 55(15), 2389-2417.
6. Probst, W. J., & McGinniss, V. D. (2006). Waterborne and solvent-based alkyds and their end users. In Alkyd Resins (pp. 103-124). John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
7. Tzatzimas, G., Karakassides, A., & Kotoulas, O. B. (2014). Rheological behavior of waterborne polyurethane coatings: Effect of thickener type and concentration. Progress in Organic Coatings, 77(2), 459-468.
8. Halim, N. S. A., Ismail, A. F., & Matsuura, T. (2010). A review on film formation of waterborne coatings. Progress in Organic Coatings, 67(3), 219-233.
9. Bierwagen, G. P. (2009). Progress in organic coatings. Elsevier Science.